Skip to main content



Read the latest Blog Posts by CFGF Board Member Peter Falcone.  Click on BLOGS Menu above and scroll down to read the posts.

Proposed 2027 County Budget — Administrative Savings Overview

On behalf of Citizens For Great Falls, the chart depicted below was submitted to Dranesville Supervisor James Bierman and Fairfax County School Board Representative Robin Lady, on March 22 2026, outlining a series of budget recommendations for their consideration. The chart illustrates approximately $30 million in potential administrative savings identified across Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) and general county operations.

 

Our recommendations emphasize FCPS central administration, contracted services, and internal operational efficiencies — and are specifically structured to avoid any impact on classroom instruction, school-based staffing, or countywide public safety services.

These figures represent constructive, community-oriented savings targets aimed at supporting responsible budgeting while preserving the services Fairfax County residents value most.

Citizens For Great Falls – FY 2027 Budget Reductions
Citizens For Great Falls

FY 2027 FCPS / County Budget
Targeted Reductions Justification Sheet

Proposed savings aligned with FY 2027 FCPS / County budget rationale
Item What We Propose How It Aligns with FY 2027 Budget Rationale
1. FCPS Vacant Central Office Positions $7M Freeze nonessential central office vacancies and permanently eliminate long-unfilled administrative positions; reassign duties within existing teams where feasible. Brings the budget in line with actual staffing levels and mirrors County and FCPS emphasis on "efforts toward greater efficiency" and limiting new resource requests, achieving savings without reducing current services or classroom staffing.
2. FCPS Nonessential Consultant Contracts $6M Scale back or cancel non-mandated consultant contracts in professional development, strategic planning, communications, curriculum consulting, and IT modernization; shift appropriate work to internal staff. Targets a known cost driver—contractual and professional services—while following the FY 2027 direction to implement agency-level savings that offset required increases, protect classroom instruction, and build internal capacity instead of relying on recurring consultant spend.
3. FCPS Software & Licensing Consolidation $4M Eliminate redundant or underutilized HR, analytics, workflow, and training platforms; consolidate licenses and negotiate enterprise pricing; delay noncritical upgrades 12–24 months. Responds to ongoing IT operating cost pressure by focusing on consolidation and smarter procurement, consistent with County and FCPS efforts to manage license and support costs while preserving essential instructional and information security systems.
4. FCPS Administrative Facilities & Leases $3M Reduce leased administrative office space through consolidation and expanded telework; pursue energy-efficiency improvements and right-size office footprints. Aligns with the County's broader push to rebalance facilities spending toward capital renewal and maintenance, shifting dollars from dispersed administrative overhead to higher-priority needs without affecting classroom space.
5. FCPS Training, Travel & Internal Programs $2M Limit central office travel and conferences; shift professional development to virtual or in-house formats; pause nonessential pilot initiatives. Uses the same first-line savings tools the County is applying (reductions in travel, training, and discretionary programs) to generate modest, targeted reductions that protect school-based training required by law or contract and maintain direct services to students.
6. Countywide Consultant Reductions (Non-FCPS) $5M Freeze new consultant contracts in non-public-safety agencies and reduce the scope of existing planning, analysis, and communications engagements; prioritize internal capacity. Supports the County Executive's strategy to implement a sizable reduction package while keeping the tax rate flat, by focusing cuts on back-office consulting rather than on core public safety or human services, and moderating overall budget growth.
7. County Administrative Overhead (Non-FCPS) $3M Reduce administrative travel, training, internal program budgets, and noncritical technology upgrades; freeze nonessential hiring in non-public-safety departments. Extends the County's documented approach of trimming administrative overhead (printing, equipment, training, personnel savings based on actuals) to realize savings with minimal service impact, helping balance the budget and prioritize high-impact programs.
8. Montessori Pilot at Great Falls ES – Transparency Request Transparency Seek clarity on site selection (including whether Title I schools were considered), long-term local funding after grant expiration, impacts on existing resources, and success metrics; request ongoing community input. Reflects FCPS and County commitments to transparency, equity, and data-driven decision-making by ensuring a partially grant-funded initiative is evaluated against clear criteria, equity goals, and budgetary tradeoffs in a year when both FCPS and the County face structural pressures.
Total Proposed Reductions (Items 1–7) $30,000,000
Citizens For Great Falls  |  FY 2027 Budget Advocacy  |  Great Falls, Virginia

Citizens For Great Falls is actively engaged on the issues that matter most to our community.

See some of our latest actions below:

CFGF Testimony and Correspondence
Citizens For Great Falls

Testimony & Correspondence

Citizens For Great Falls is working on your behalf — engaging leaders and officials on the issues that shape life in Great Falls. Read about our recent efforts below.
Public Testimony
Dec. 3, 2025
TestimonySupport for Lift Me Up! Special Permit application.
Jan. 7, 2026
TestimonyChallenging a zoning determination on pickleball in a front yard.
Correspondence & Letters
Jul. 15, 2025
CorrespondenceTo County Planning Commission — six specific requests to amend the proposed Zoning Ordinance on Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) to improve safety and protect adjacent residential property owners from insurance rate impacts.
Oct. 15, 2025
CorrespondenceTo County Planning Commission — objecting to a draft Zoning Ordinance Amendment on Electrical Substations, citing noise, visual impact, and safety concerns for nearby residential areas.
Oct. 30, 2025
CorrespondenceTo School Board Rep. Robyn Lady — concerns and recommendations regarding the ongoing school boundary review process.
Jan. 12, 2026
CorrespondencePreliminary endorsement of the residential development plan for Castleton Hills (former site of Wolftrap Nursery).
Regulatory & Agency Outreach
Apr. 3, 2025
CorrespondenceTo Supervisor Bierman — documenting the overnight tanker truck accident in which more than 2,000 gallons of hazardous material were discharged on Leigh Mill Road, and urging action on the safety risks posed by tractor trailers hauling hazardous cargo through Great Falls.
Apr. 10, 2025
EmailTo Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality — requesting a formal investigation of the April 3 HazMat incident on Leigh Mill Road and assistance for homeowners in testing private wells that may have been placed at risk.
Citizens For Great Falls  |  Advocacy & Community Engagement  |  Great Falls, Virginia

News / Articles

Great Falls Couple Launch Petition on Pickleball Regulation

Peter Falcone | Published on 8/5/2025

Great Falls Couple Launches a Petition to Gain Protection
from the Placement of a Pickleball Court Next to Their Home


Would You Want a Pickleball Court 100 Feet from your Bedroom?

The Issue

Would You Want a Pickleball Court 100 Feet from your Bedroom?

Fairfax County's zoning regulations are being applied in a manner that would permit outdoor pickleball courts on residential properties without adequate protections for nearby homes — a situation made possible because current zoning and noise ordinances fail to address the sport’s uniquely disruptive noise, leaving nearby homes vulnerable to constant disturbance.

Pickleball is here to stay. We support recreation but reject poorly planned development that harms residents.


We urge the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors to act now

Unregulated pickleball noise is not just an annoyance—it’s a documented health and property risk. The science is clear. The community is united. It’s time for Fairfax County to lead by adopting zoning and noise standards that reflect the harmful characteristics and impacts of impulsive noise from pickleball. Protect neighborhoods. Protect health. Protect home values.

We, the undersigned residents of Fairfax County, respectfully petition the Board of Supervisors and the Park Authority to adopt and enforce stronger zoning regulations on the placement and operation of pickleball courts, based on the growing and well-documented evidence that pickleball noise constitutes a significant nuisance to residential communities.


Background and Rationale

Pickleball has seen explosive demand evidenced by a 293% increase in dedicated pickleball courts since 2021 at Fairfax County Park Authority parks, according to FCPA’s FY24 Sports Court Update. While recreation and community engagement are important, the expansion of this sport has introduced harmful and sustained noise into residential areas—noise that science, federal guidance, and local experience affirm as uniquely disruptive.


Highly Impulsive Noise Requires Correction:

The distinctive “pop” of pickleball is not like ordinary ambient park noise. Per EPA 1974 guidelines and ANSI S12.9-2005 Part 4, highly impulsive sounds such as those generated by pickleball paddles require an additional +12 dB correction due to their uniquely disturbing character. The 0.125s response time of digital meters further masks true noise impact, as most meters average out peaks instead of registering instantaneous spikes.

"The pickleball noise problem is real and significant, pitting pickleball players against residents, and potentially impacting pickleball businesses and community planning."


Peak Sound Levels Comparable to Industrial Hazards:

Studies estimate that the instantaneous peak of a pickleball "pop" can reach 120–130 dB, comparable to a chainsaw or rock concert (source: Pickleball Science). However, most sound meters average these values down to 70 dB, vastly underrepresenting the real disturbance. Averages are inadequate to measure annoyance or health impact. "The hollow interior of the paddle behaves in a manner similar to that of a drum shell, which amplifies the acoustic resonances." 


Expert Consensus on Irritation: In a published news story, Fairfax County Park Authority Director Jai Cole was quoted about shutting down pickleball: “It’s unethical of me to force even one resident to endure the sounds that we ourselves have identified as being a nuisance.” According to sound engineer Bill Bulté, quoted in the New York Times (June 30, 2023), "pickleball noise is annoying to humans." Over 1,000 public comments on that article echoed the same.

Impact on Property Values: Independent analyses suggest that proximity to pickleball courts lowers home values, particularly when courts are within 200–300 feet of residential properties. Homeowners have expressed growing concerns about long-term equity erosion due to constant, unavoidable noise.


Failures in Current Regulation

Fairfax County’s current internal guideline of a 250-foot setback is not uniformly enforced. The FCPA FY24 report lists 17 parks where pickleball courts are within 33 to 129 feet of residential property lines, including Hollin Hall, Kendale Woods, and Martin Luther King Jr. Park.

Other localities such as Arlington County have faced lawsuit threats from civic associations and responded with fencing, buffering, and court relocation. Arlington now mandates acoustic barriers and a minimum 170-foot distance between courts and homes, showing that better solutions are available and necessary.


Petition Demands

We, the residents, call upon Fairfax County to take the following actions: Update its Zoning Ordinance to Prevent Poorly Sited Pickleball Courts and Update Standards for Noise Enforcement.

Specifically, we ask:

Setback from Residential Properties

Based on EPA guidance and acoustic studies, setbacks should range from a minimum of 250 feet up to 800 feet, depending on specific site conditions such as topography, the number of courts, and the absence of natural sound barriers. Any deviations from the minimum should follow the standards recommended by the Fairfax County Park Authority in 2024 and reflect a scientifically supported need to protect residents from harmful noise exposure. For proposed courts less than 1,000 feet from a residential property, an acoustic engineer conducts a noise impact assessment prepared by a qualified acoustic engineer in accordance with ISO 9613 and ANSI S12.62, demonstrating that impulsive noise would be attenuated to a level that cannot be discerned from background noise at all property boundaries.

Enforce a 250-Foot Minimum Setback from Fairfax County Park-zoned land

Align with the FY24 Fairfax County Sport Court Update pickleball mitigation requirements and the Spendiarian & Willis 2018 recommendation that any court within 350 feet of homes requires mitigation; courts under 150 feet need significant abatement design.

Mandate Acoustic Mitigation for Existing Courts For any pickleball courts within 250 feet of a residential property:

Install sound-absorbing barriers (not just reflective ones like Acoustifence). Limit hours of play to prevent early morning and late evening disruption. Require use of certified quiet paddles and balls only.

Include Community Input in Site Selection

  • Require Board of Zoning public notification and a hearing before the siting or expansion of any court within 500 feet of homes.
  • Adopt Impulse Noise-Based Metrics
  • Revise measurement protocols to account for impulse noise per ANSI/EPA guidance and not rely solely on Leq or A-weighted dBA averages, which are scientifically inadequate for impulsive sounds.
  • Suspend Court Additions in Residential Areas
  • Until the above regulations are adopted, pause the construction or conversion of any new pickleball facilities within 500 feet of homes.


Conclusion

Pickleball is here to stay. We support recreation but reject poorly planned development that harms residents. The question is whether we plan for it or react to it. Currently, courts are being sited without considering their unique sound profile or the physical and psychological impacts of the sounds on neighbors. That’s not fair to players or residents.

Fairfax County has the opportunity—and the responsibility—to lead on this issue. By updating its zoning and noise ordinances, the County can ensure that this popular sport can continue to grow—without generating unnecessary conflict or harm.

Fairfax County must act now to protect quality of life, public health and property values.

Sign the petition. Contact your local Supervisor. Spread the word.

https://chng.it/cXYsNdgYyc

Let’s keep our neighborhoods livable — and our zoning smart.

 

 

Return to Previous Page