Skip to main content

CFGF Issues 2026 Legislative Scorecard and Priorities


Citizens For Great Falls published its 2026 legislative priorities in advance of the 2026 Virginia Legislative Session "Pre-filing period," which began on Monday, Nov.17. The scorecard outlines the organization's list of topic areas it urges the General Assembly to consider. It was also submitted to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, which took up its own legislative program at its regular meeting on Nov. 18.


The complete CFGF Legislative Scorecard and Priorities document may be viewed here: CFGF Legislative Scorecard and Priorities 2026


CFGF Submits Comments on Policy Plan Amendment

In follow-up action, CFGF President John Halacy submitted comments to the Board of Supervisors on the Policy Plan Amendment to the County-wide Comprehensive Plan in advance of its consideration during a public hearing on the Amendment on Nov. 18.


The Policy Plan outlines the goals, policies, and objectives set by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors regarding various aspects of community planning, including:

  • Land Use: Strategies for sustainably managing growth and development.
  • Transportation: Policies to enhance mobility and connectivity within the county.
  • Housing: Guidelines to ensure diverse and affordable housing options.
  • Environment: Initiatives aimed at protecting natural resources and promoting sustainability


Read the CFGF's comments here: CFGF Comments for BOS re Policy Plan Amendment to Comprehensive Plan


News / Articles

Letter To The Editor Great Falls Connection

John Halacy | Published on 7/2/2025

Opinion: Fairfax County Shouldn’t Take Out the Trash — or Our Right to Choose

 

By John Halacy

July 1, 2025 

Fairfax County officials are promoting a policy shift towards a government-run trash collection system, the Unified Sanitation District (USD) model.  It will be discussed in a public hearing on October 14. This proposal aims to improve service, reduce carbon footprints, and achieve sustainability goals, but it raises significant concerns about consumer choice and competition.

Currently, homeowners can choose their trash hauler, allowing selection based on cost, service, or support for local businesses. The USD model threatens this flexibility and could lead to a one-size-fits-all approach. Predictions of fewer trash trucks and lower environmental impact lack solid data, and the prospect of USD could negatively affect smaller, family-run businesses.

The county claims USD could lower costs for homeowners.  But their cost comparisons with areas like Arlington and Prince William Counties and Raleigh, NC, are misleading due to the omission of tipping fees as a cost factor. For instance, Fairfax County charges $90 per ton for commercial solid waste disposal, while Arlington, Prince William, Raleigh, and others cited all charge significantly less.  We need an honest portrayal of the facts.

Centralization, a key element of USD, can increase bureaucracy, reduce efficiency, and diminish competition. The assumption that county management will yield better environmental outcomes is uncertain without rigorous measurement. A hasty move to USD could undermine local businesses and service quality.

Any significant change in services should be based on evidence, public engagement, and a recognition of the diverse needs of Fairfax County communities.

The urge to centralize services may be well-intentioned, but it ignores the everyday value that choice and competition bring to the process. The county doesn’t need a mandated monopoly and additional county fees. It needs a practical, cost-effective system that respects its residents’ right to choose, and holds all providers, public or private, to the highest standard.  Let’s not throw away what works.

John Halacy is a Fairfax County resident and President of Citizens For Great Falls, a newly formed community-based non-profit advocacy organization.